Post by account_disabled on Nov 22, 2023 4:29:40 GMT -5
To talk about committing a crime, the employee must be caught red-handed and his actions must be confirmed by the court in a final judgment. Loss of rights necessary to work in the position held due to the employee's fault Employees very often must have the necessary qualifications to be able to work at a specific job position. Such typical authorizations include, for example, a driving license or the authorization to operate machinery. In such cases, the loss of a driving license due to excessive speed or driving under the influence of alcohol will constitute grounds for disciplinary dismissal of the employee.
Sample court judgments Court judgments issued, quite often by the Supreme Court, contain very different decisions; we will describe some of them below. Court judgment number Resolution Sign. act II PK of October , In its judgment, the Supreme Court photo editing servies reinstated the employee. The case in question concerned the disclosure to an unauthorized person of information that the employee had become familiar with in connection with his work. In the Court's opinion, this violated basic employee duties, but the employer did not prove the employee's fault Sign. act I PK of June.
In this judgment, the Supreme Court also agreed with the employee. In the justification, he wrote, among other things, that no specific action was provided that the employee performed incorrectly. In the opinion of the Supreme Court, the plaintiff's employment contract could be terminated without notice only if it was proven that an intentional violation of the blood test procedure was proven. Sign. No. III PK of November , In this case, that the burden of proof resting on the employer means the obligation to prove the employee's guilt.
Sample court judgments Court judgments issued, quite often by the Supreme Court, contain very different decisions; we will describe some of them below. Court judgment number Resolution Sign. act II PK of October , In its judgment, the Supreme Court photo editing servies reinstated the employee. The case in question concerned the disclosure to an unauthorized person of information that the employee had become familiar with in connection with his work. In the Court's opinion, this violated basic employee duties, but the employer did not prove the employee's fault Sign. act I PK of June.
In this judgment, the Supreme Court also agreed with the employee. In the justification, he wrote, among other things, that no specific action was provided that the employee performed incorrectly. In the opinion of the Supreme Court, the plaintiff's employment contract could be terminated without notice only if it was proven that an intentional violation of the blood test procedure was proven. Sign. No. III PK of November , In this case, that the burden of proof resting on the employer means the obligation to prove the employee's guilt.